Thanks for the responses, gents
Carmen: yes - that is what I see in the manual
Jim: Thanks for the update - it would appear that the manual requires an
update
Peter: I'm still trying to fully assimilate what you've said - very
detailed & complete. Where did you get all this from? Is it documented
somewhere, or is it something you've 'soaked up through your fingertips'
over the years?

I have to say that even after 40 years on mainframes I still don't fully
understand this kind of memory-associated stuff
I can understand that it's rooted in the past when 'memory' was expensive
so it had to be protected from over-commitment.
These days, though, I find it next to impossible to justify insufficient
physical memory; it's so cheap (comparatively speaking), there's just no
excuse.
Even if your environment is thus limited then paging to/from disks on a
RAID array removes most of any remaining constraints.
Given that (probably poorly-informed) stance, then REGION and MEMLIMIT
limits become pretty much meaningless. Don't they?

Regards
Sean


On Tue, 20 Nov 2018 at 07:49, Peter Hunkeler <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>
> From fading memory, so things might have change slightly, but I think most
> of this still applies.
>
>
> The REGION and MEMLIMIT values that apply to z/OS UNIX processes depend on
> how and where the process is running:
>
>
> a) BATCH jobs, started tasks, TSO user sessions
> A program run as batch job, started task, or in a TSO session gets its
> REGION and MEMLIMIT via JCL, which may be changed by IEFUSI (and IEFLIMIT).
> When this program makes use of z/OS UNIX services, it will become dubbed,
> i.e. it becomes a UINX process. It still runs in the same address space.
> Nothing changes with respect to REGION or MEMLIMT.
>
>
> When this process spawn()s (non-local spawn) or fork()s a new process,
> that new process will be in a BPXAS address space. REGION and MEMLIMT will
> be inherited from the originating batch job address space. None of the z/OS
> UNIX settings apply.
>
>
> IEFUSI will gin control in the BPXAS address space before the UNIX process
> gets control. OMVS set REGION to the magic value 54M. This has not meaning
> and will later be replaced by the values from the originating batch job. (I
> don‘t know why 54M was chosen as the indicator value.)
>
>
> b) If a z/OS UNIX process is a daemon, such as FTPD, otelnetd, etc. which
> listens for incoming session calls, then authenticates the new user, and
> spawn()s / fork()s a new process for this new user, then REGION and
> MEMLIMIT will be set from the z/OS UNIX parameters (ASSIZEMAX/MAXASSIZE,
> etc). It is not useful to inherit those values from the parent process in
> these cases. The parent is the server, the childs are the unser sessions.
> They serve different means.
>
>
> So, your IEFUSI should not touch the REGION and MEMLIMIT field when it is
> called for OMVS address spaces (see flags as described in the IEFUSI
> description). And, for the putty sessions, the MAXASSIZE or ASSIZEMAX value
> should apply. Try to run Mark Zelden‘s REXXSTOR in a TSO session, after TSO
> OMVS, and in a putty session to see the differences
>
>
> From the „z/OS MVs Installation Exits“ manual:
> Additional Considerations for z/OS UNIX Applications:
> When running z/OS UNIX applications you need to consider that fork and
> spawn are issued to create new address spaces. The default processing on
> fork and spawn is for the z/OS UNIX kernel to propagate the region size
> from the parent to the child. Because the region size in the parent process
> has already passed through IEFUSI and has an approved region size, IBM
> recommends that you bypass normal IEFUSI processing when the subsystem
> (Word 8) is OMVS.
>
>
> At the time of IEFUSI processing, the kernel has not yet propagated the
> parent's region size to the child, so IEFUSI has nothing to work with. If
> IEFUSI modifies the region size of the child process, the kernel will honor
> that region size and not propagate the region size from parent to child.
> This can result in failure of a fork if the region size is insufficient in
> the child to capture the parent's storage.
>
>
>  --
> Peter Hunkeler
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to