On Nov 15, 2018, at 10:33 AM, Charles Mills <[email protected]> wrote: > > I am personally not fond of IEABRCX. The whole point of assembler is tight > control of the generated machine code; not compiler magic. It is not hard at > all to do CHG B J PREFIX and work through them one at a time either accepting > each proposed change or finding the next. Or CHG BE JE WORD and work through > all of the BH, BL, BNE and so forth. Anything you miss is easy to find: > you'll get an addressability error message from the assembler. >
I would always use Jxx in code I write myself, but IEABRCX is useful if you’re using older macros that haven’t been updated to take ARCHLVL into account. -- Pew, Curtis G [email protected] ITS Systems/Core/Administrative Services ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
