As Peter mentioned, there is no reason for either SSA(I)R or adding the ALET. The ALET 1 is useable as it is. Simply LAM it into the AR and go AR mode.
What is the issue you are trying to solve? On Sat, 10 Nov 2018 17:37:50 -0500 Joseph Reichman <[email protected]> wrote: :>I think for SSAR I might need to set the AX value to 1 :>Via AXSET macro correct ? :> :> :> :>> On Nov 10, 2018, at 8:43 AM, Peter Relson <[email protected]> wrote: :>> :>> <snip> :>> Given the choice of using the SSAR instruction with a ALET of 1 :>> And adding a access list entry via ALESERV which is the preferred method :>> </snip> :>> :>> I do not accept the conditions of contest. Neither is an acceptable method :>> in general. :>> :>> You might not have authorization to SSAR. And a target address space needs :>> to be non-swappable in general. :>> Setting things up so that you have authorization to SSAR to a space can :>> have system integrity consequences. :>> Further, if this is a reusable ASID, SSAR will not work in any case, you :>> would need to use SSAIR. :>> :>> The current secondary address space can always be accessed using ALET=1 in :>> AR ASC mode. :>> :>> Peter Relson :>> z/OS Core Technology Design -- Binyamin Dissen <[email protected]> http://www.dissensoftware.com Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me, you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com domain. I very rarely bother responding to challenge/response systems, especially those from irresponsible companies. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
