MVS-OE ha a more restricted scope than IBM-MAIN. You might have a better chance of your message being seen by a SME if you post it to a more specific list. On the flip side, you get more eyeballs on a list of broader scope. They are both useful.
The same applies to other topics: ISPF, JES2, RACF, REXX and TSO are all relevant in IBM-MAIN, -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 ________________________________________ From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu> on behalf of Charles Mills <charl...@mcn.org> Sent: Sunday, August 19, 2018 11:26 AM To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu Subject: Re: StackExchange proposed mainframe discussion group "The archives" are partitioned inconveniently now. MVS-OE is an example all by itself. How is a z/OS UNIX ("MVS-OE") problem different from a mainframe ("IBM-MAIN") problem? And aren't the IBM-MAIN archives themselves partitioned into "old" and "new"? Charles -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin > Would this partition the archives inconveniently This week I searched successfully for a 15-year old article in MVS-OE. Would I lose this capability? -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
