Charles Mills wrote:
Thank you -- I did not know about not. I see here
https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/operator_alternative that there is a
whole family of these including not_eq.
I have encountered IBM files that used the C++ trigraphs: ??< for { and so
forth. What an unreadable mess! (IMHO, obviously)
Charles
C++17 removes support for Trigraphs in the language... but, I'm sure
many compilers will
continue to support them as an extension.
- Dave R. -
--
riv...@dignus.com Work: (919) 676-0847
Get your mainframe programming tools at http://www.dignus.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
