Well, it's not a "problem" (FSVO "problem") but in an example that is supposed to show the fast way of doing things, one might avoid slower instructions, such as storage literal references, when alternatives like TMLH and LLILF are now available.
Agreed, PLO would be a poor choice. Charles -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Seymour J Metz Sent: Monday, June 25, 2018 10:45 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Eternal WAIT on un-waited ECB > The fast POST example is unfortunately based on System 370 instructions. Why is that a problem? Wouldn't something like PLO be overkill? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
