We've had zIIPs for years. We monitored usage but were never terribly concerned 
as long as numbers didn't skyrocket. When we moved to DB2 V10, however, we were 
warned that 'some customers' were experiencing serious performance problems 
when zIIP eligible work spilled over to general CPs. The reason, we were told, 
was that while general CP management had evolved over the decades with a huge 
boatload of OS code to handle contention, zIIPs were newcomers that were more 
or less on their own in playground competition. The wiry little guys with 
little bully protection. 

The message we got was that an overloaded zIIP could lead to performance 
problems--and rolling average spikes--that could be worse (!) than having no 
zIIP at all. We were sufficiently alarmed that we were moved to buy yet another 
zIIP to guard against calamity in production. Because we acquired the extra 
zIIP early on, I can't say what the consequence would have been if we had done 
nothing, but this is certainly the tale I'd rather be telling. 

.
.
J.O.Skip Robinson
Southern California Edison Company
Electric Dragon Team Paddler 
SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager
323-715-0595 Mobile
626-543-6132 Office ⇐=== NEW
[email protected]

-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf 
Of Peter Hunkeler
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2018 9:21 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: (External):AW: Re: Why are highly busy zIIPs worse than highly busy 
CPs?

 
>Isn't "fall back to the CP" because one would typically want one's work 
>to
run *somewhere* even if a zIIP were not available but perhaps a CP was? 




If you meant no zIIPs are available to the LPAR (not configured or the CEC does 
not have some), then there is no fall-back. Work units get queue on CP work 
queues initially; the zIIP work queue is not being used. At least this is how I 
understand it.


If you meant no free zIIP capacity is available, then part of the decision 
might have been that initially you could have only half as many zIIPs as you 
had CPs. 


--
Peter Hunkeler


----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to