AFAIK, SMCS was limited to 3270, which would give you TN3270 but not line-mode telnet. Neither 3210 nor 3215 was supported by VTAM.
-- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 ________________________________________ From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> on behalf of John McKown <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2018 1:45 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: VTL as 3490 vs 3590 On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 12:42 PM Seymour J Metz <[email protected]> wrote: > 3210 and 3215 are local non-SNA devices; there is no telnet equivalent. > Hum, how about an LU1 console? I guess I could use c3270 to script an SMCS console. But, that's more work {frown}. Guess I'm stuck with CA-OPS/MVS, which is really quite nice. > > "ncurses, foiled again" (GD&R) > > -- Once a government places vague notions of public safety and security above the preservation of freedom, a general loss of liberty is sure to follow. GCS Griffin -- Pelaran Alliance -- TFS Guardian (book) Maranatha! <>< John McKown ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
