Somewhere along the way, you seem to have missed the point. Which is, the proposal is REJECTED, with prejudice. It has no more chance than a baby june bug in a 100-watt zapper (unless your org. provides >5% of IBM's revenue, and Ginny R. always answers your calls).
Y'all feel free to continue down your primrose path, perhaps noting that no one is listening to you anymore. You've come up with a solution to a problem no one has. The best way to shorten this tiresome thread would be to stop extending it. Nevertheless, I'm confident P. Edwards will have to have the last word. Which is fine and dandy; but the sooner the better. sas On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 5:27 PM, somitcw < 000001b1f179dc6e-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > ... > Please help shorten this thread by helping with the wording needed to > request an AMODE 64 enhancement for AMODE 64 programs that > would double the 4-byte addressable for data. > Moving extended common would be icing on the cake. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
