Clark,

It's not that the process is reading a 2nd record in the same CI. That would
result in a buffer hit irrespective of whether it is LSR or NSR.

The empirical evidence of his test with BUFND=2 reduced from BUFND=240 is
that the program reads more than one CI sequentially for each skip. That
alone makes the file a poor candidate for LSR.

Ron



-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of Clark Morris
Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2018 4:50 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [IBM-MAIN] VSAM Performance - CPU reduction

[Default] On 23 Jan 2018 17:35:50 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
[email protected] (Ron hawkins) wrote:

>Clark,
>
>If you had time to read through this lengthy thread you will find that 
>the 2nd file uses skip-sequential access. LSR is usually not an 
>appropriate strategy for this access pattern.

I realize he was using skip sequential.  My point was that random access
looks like it could be a better fit for this file than skip sequential
especially since a second record may have to be read after the first record
is found on the second file.

Clark Morris
>
>The OP has tried reducing BUFND on the second file, and observed a 
>reduction in throughput, which verifies the extent to which the 
>sequential access is taking advantage of chained Cis.
>
>Ron
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] 
>On Behalf Of Clark Morris
>Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2018 4:57 PM
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: Re: [IBM-MAIN] VSAM Performance - CPU reduction
>
>[Default] On 5 Jan 2018 16:28:48 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main 
>[email protected] (Arun Venkatratnam) wrote:
>
>>Hi All,
>>
>>We are looking to improve the performance of a COBOL program that 
>>processes
>2 VSAM files. The first file is the I/P file and every record read from 
>the input VSAM file is searched for a matching record in the other file 
>and a report is written. The program also applies some business rules 
>while comparing each matching record.
>>
>>The I/P file is read sequentially while the other file is read in a 
>>skip
>sequential basis. The test files that were used had 32M records each 
>while production files have 110M records each.
>
>I assume using random access for the second file was tried with 
>adequate buffering for index and data. BLSR or the more current means 
>of doing random access buffering should have been used.  It may also 
>help to save any randomly read record that were read based on 
>information in records from the second file based on the match with a 
>record from the first file.  Knowing access patterns can help in
determining the best solution.
>
>Clark Morris
>>
>>Attached is the strobe report from the execution of the test job. The 
>>test
>job takes nearly 7 CPU minutes and was profiled to capture about 1 CPU 
>minute of execution time.
>>
>>We are attempting to optimize the VSAM access to these files as it is 
>>seen
>to take more than 50% of the CPU consumed by this job.
>>
>>In the 'Attribution of CPU execution time' section, we see that the 
>>major
>contributors are the components 'QSAM INIT I/O  & EXITS' (Module 
>IGZEQBL) and PARTITION COMMUNICATION.
>>
>>Could you please help us understand:
>>
>>1.What these components are
>>2.Why is QSAM access used instead of VSAM I/O access.
>>3.What needs to be done to reduce the CPU consumption by these components.
>>
>>Thank you
>>
>>Arun
>>
>>
>>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>-
>>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>-
>>--------------------
>>
>>1Strobe* PERFORMANCE PROFILE                             PROGRAMA
>01/02/2018           PAGE  42 
>>
>
>>-  #ACE                                   ** ATTRIBUTION OF CPU EXECUTION
>TIME **                                        
>>-.COBLIB  IGZCPCO  IGZEVIO   VSAM INPUT/OUTPUT
>
>> ---------------------------WAS INVOKED BY---------------------
>-----------------VIA-----------------------  CPU TIME %
>> XACTION           MODULE   SECTION  DESCRIPTION                   MODULE
>SECTION  DESCRIPTION              SOLO  TOTAL
>>
>
>>          .LELIB   CEEBINIT          LE/370 BATCH INIT/TERM
>.32   32
>>          .LELIB   CEEBINIT          LE/370 BATCH INIT/TERM        IGZEQBL
>QSAM INIT I/O  & EXITS            1.93  1.93
>>
>
>> XACTION  MODULE   SECTION   LOCATION  LINE   SOURCE TEXT          MODULE
>SECTION  DESCRIPTION                         
>>
>
>>          PROGRAMA PROGRAMA   003522
>1.30  1.30
>>
>----- -----
>>
>3.55  3.55
>>-.VSAM    IDA019L1           VSAM RECORD MANAGEMENT
>
>> ---------------------------WAS INVOKED BY---------------------
>-----------------VIA-----------------------                CPU TIME %
>> XACTION           MODULE   SECTION  DESCRIPTION                   MODULE
>SECTION  DESCRIPTION                   SOLO  TOTAL
>>
>
>>          .LELIB   CEEBINIT          LE/370 BATCH INIT/TERM        IGZEQBL
>QSAM INIT I/O  & EXITS              1.84  1.84
>>          .LELIB   CEEBINIT          LE/370 BATCH INIT/TERM        IGZEQBL
>CURRMEM  QSAM INIT I/O  & EXITS       4.34  4.38
>>          .LELIB   CEEBINIT          LE/370 BATCH INIT/TERM        IGZEQBL
>DVFILE   QSAM INIT I/O  & EXITS            .03   .03
>>          .LELIB   CEEBINIT          LE/370 BATCH INIT/TERM        IGZEQBL
>PREVMEM  QSAM INIT I/O  & EXITS      22.48 22.51
>>
>
>> XACTION  MODULE   SECTION   LOCATION  LINE   SOURCE TEXT          MODULE
>SECTION  DESCRIPTION                         
>>
>
>>          PROGRAMA PROGRAMA   003522                               IGZCPCO
>CURRMEM  PARTITION COMMUNICATION    4.15  4.19
>>          PROGRAMA PROGRAMA   003522                               IGZCPCO
>IGZEVIO  VSAM INPUT/OUTPUT                   .57   .57
>>          PROGRAMA PROGRAMA   003522                               IGZCPCO
>PREVMEM  PARTITION COMMUNICATION  16.80 16.80
>>
>----- -----
>>
>
>> 50.22 50.32
>>
>>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send 
>>email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send 
>email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send 
>email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email
to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to