Yeah, we put performance bonds on everything from pencil sharpeners to 
bulldozers. In the past we were able to work out agreements with vendors. Some 
scale, some fail some just pass it on. In a tort friendly state we usually at 
least cover the cost of conversion.


In a message dated 1/11/2018 8:19:13 AM Central Standard Time, 
scott.chap...@epstrategies.com writes:

 
Having said all that, if there is a chance of it being exploited, it will have 
to be mitigated. The question comes from how much of an impact that mitigation 
is going to have and whether it's made optional or not. (Some of the Linux 
mitigations can be selectively disabled.) If it's optional, then it comes down 
to a risk assessment, and it's going to take much more information before sites 
can make a choice. If it's not optional (or if the risk assessment indicates 
many sites need to enable the mitigation) and if the impact is more than a 
small single digit impact for typical workloads, then... this will get really 
"interesting".

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to