I don't have a problem with people controlling things. I have a major problem 
with people controlling things that they don't understand, especially if 
someone else takes the heat when the balloon goes up.


--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3

________________________________________
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> on behalf of 
Roger W. Suhr (GMail) <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2017 5:43 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Disable DYNALLOC?

My 5 cents:  Why do people always have to control everything.  DYNALLOC is a 
beautiful thing.  It has to be used properly, for sure and it's not a "one size 
fits all" tool, but it is very useful.
If you really have to control all allocations, then look into using and exit 
(DADSM,SMS comes to mind).

-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf 
Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2017 17:38
To: [email protected]
Subject: Disable DYNALLOC?

>From a recent thread (rant?) in ASSEMBLER-LIST:

    ... Do you stand by "SVC 99 for good measure"? Generally, products
    do not implement it for good reason. Irrelevant in CICS and IMS.
    In batch, it bypasses job scheduler, job restart, violates  production
    control requirements, bypasses JES3 resource management
    and potentially poses a production security risk. TSO has the
    alloc command which can easily be used in clists. It exists
    because of  MVS UNIX.  ...

Disregard the anachronism in the last sentence.  If, hypothetically, DYNALLOC 
except by initiator is so harmful as to be prohibited in production jobs, is 
there any way to do so?  If it were possible, what would be the collateral 
damage?  What fraction of production jobs would work, unmodified, without using 
DYNALLOC?

Are code reviews a better technique?  Other (specify)?

-- gil

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
[email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to