On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 6:47 AM, Tom Marchant < [email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Dec 2017 17:28:41 -0500, scott Ford wrote: > > >If i had a main line in assembler and set a ESTAE before calling a Cobol > >main routine, > >could i intercept the 'C stcname' and be able to recovery ? > > I'm not sure. Having set your ESTAE(X), then calling your Cobol main > routine, I'm pretty sure LE would establish its own ESTAE(X), which > would receive control first. Will it percolate to you in all the cases > you are interested in? If I wanted to do something like this, I would > establish the LE environment before setting your ESTAE(X). > I was wondering about that. But then I thought that if I have an ESTAEX with a TERM=YES specified. And I then LINK to an LE main program, which issues an ESTAE(X) with TERM=NO, will the second ESTAEX exit be invoked for a CANCEL command (shouldn't because TERM=NO) or will my ESTAEX exit be invoked because it does have TERM=YES. I suppose that if I were really interested, I could test that myself. And I may later. > > -- > Tom Marchant > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > -- I have a theory that it's impossible to prove anything, but I can't prove it. Maranatha! <>< John McKown ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
