On Sun, 3 Dec 2017 16:04:26 -0500, Edward Finnell wrote: >There were two or three guys active in SHARE that had the CAD(Cloak and >dagger) site code. One of their jobs was to evaluate operating systems for >'security'. IIRC only MULTICS was higher than MVS. The evaluations were >published, maybe it was a green book. Then on last page "if it's connected to >a network these evaluations are null and void." > "if it's connected to a network ..." is pretty restrictive nowadays. Perhaps less so in the heyday of MULTICS.
>Then they moved to a different standard altogether but kept the basics intact. > > >In a message dated 12/3/2017 11:25:40 AM Central Standard Time, writes: > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trusted_Computer_System_Evaluation_Criteria#B_–_Mandatory_protection -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
