On Tue, 10 Oct 2017 22:18:47 -0500, Tim Hare wrote: >I know I am late to this, but I see no BLOCK CONTAINS 0 RECORDS in the COBOL. >I'm not totally current on COBOL releases, but >A) is that still required to use block size from the JCL > Even better, it will use the block size supplied by SDB.
>B) is it even relevant in this instance - COBOL will use the block size value >of the dataset that's input, yes? -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
