We changed our philosophy recently.

SYS1 datasets on IPL volume and any needed for IPL.

We now have our CICS HLQ as SYS3 and MQ as SYS3. These both have a SYS1
alias to avoid JCL changes.

So for example, CICS alias is SYS1.CICSTS.SDFHLOAD points to
SYS3.CICSTS&CICSVER.SDFHLOAD (&CICSVER is a system symbol).



On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 4:22 PM, Lizette Koehler <[email protected]>
wrote:

> So conventions are on a shop basis.  Whatever the shop wants to use, is
> the convention
>
> I have known some shops to use this
>
>    SYS1CA    for all CA Products
>    SYS1IBM   for all IBM products
>    SYS1ORC   for all Oracle products and so on
>
> I have known some shops to use this
>
>    SYS1 - all IBM Products
>    SYS2 - Vendor A products
>    SYS3 - Vendor B products
>
> And so on.
>
> When they got to SYS9 - they began to uses SYSA
>
> Some shops do
>
> SYS1 - Only MCAT products    then use second level qualifier to identify
> vendor - IBM CA etc
>
> When some shops install Serverpac, they use CEE for LE, BPX, etc  that is
> the names used by IBM
>
> When some shops install Serverpac, they change the IBM names in server pac
> to shop standards - SYS1.CEE rather than CEE
>
> Everything is based on what the shop standards are.
>
> So bottom line, No Standard for naming convention.  Each shop makes that
> determination.  And that standard is affected by your SAF product and
> application naming convetions.
>
>
> SYS3 is not a standard in the business to indicate a 3rd party vendor.
>
>
> HTH
>
> Lizette
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On
> > Behalf Of Tony Thigpen
> > Sent: Sunday, September 24, 2017 7:18 PM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: SYS3 datasets
> >
> > We have a staff z/OS systems programmer who claims that:
> > "Almost all shops use the SYS3. HLQ to indicate third party software."
> >
> > So new software installs *have* to follow that "rule". (Past installs
> did not
> > follow such a rule.)
> >
> > I am thinking that this "rule" is really just *his* rule.
> >
> > Opinions?
> >
> > How many other sites follow such a rule?
> >
> > --
> > Tony Thigpen
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send
> email to
> > [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>



-- 
Wayne V. Bickerdike

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to