We have our set to CSA=(2400,320M). However, you need to review what CSA is 
being used, because it is allocated on the 1M boundary.  But, for ECSA, you 
should have any problems increasing it without any issues.

Jerry Edgington
11450 Grooms Road | Cincinnati, Ohio  45242
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf 
Of Nai, Dean
Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2017 2:36 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: IEASYSxx CSA

Hi,



  We have been getting messages from health checker about ECSA at 84%. We added 
another DB2 so that probably pushed us over 80%. Currently we have it set at 
CSA=(2M,200M). Any suggestions on increasing it?



Dean Nai

Senior z/OS Systems Programmer

Mainframe Technical Support Group

Department of Information Technology

State of New Hampshire

27 Hazen Drive

Concord, NH 03301

 work: 603-271-1529





Statement of Confidentiality: The contents of this message are

confidential.

Any unauthorized disclosure, reproduction, use or dissemination (either

whole or in part) is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient of

this message, please notify the sender immediately and delete the message

from your system.

















On 9/14/17, 2:16 PM, "IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Giliad Wilf" 
<[email protected] on behalf of 
[email protected]> wrote:



>Yes, but no PDSE may be listed in LPALSTxx, and since LPALSTxx must list 
>SYS1.LPALIB, it can't be a PDSE.

>

>On Thu, 14 Sep 2017 07:13:38 -0500, Tom Marchant <[email protected]> 
>wrote:

>

>>On Thu, 14 Sep 2017 13:02:54 +0200, Peter Hunkeler wrote:

>>

>>>The LPA is built as part of the IPL process, but only load modules

>>>not programs objects can be loaded into PLA at that time because

>>>program objects live in PDS/Es.

>>

>>The LPA statement in PROGxx is processed at the end of IPL.

>>PDSEs can be included at that time.

>>

>>https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ibm.com_support_knowledgecenter_SSLTBW-5F2.1.0_com.ibm.zos.v2r1.ieae200_proglpa.htm&d=DwIGaQ&c=WUZzGzAb7_N4DvMsVhUlFrsw4WYzLoMP5bgx2U7ydPE&r=gEY-_N3_t4QXFrS5e-OgAibMMWGnLPFFfmDVHG_3lz4&m=kKCuS3xTw0cw3cGXIMFV1GU4Nnn6FVTCI9oYXJf2Q8Q&s=HDQePvLHDpACJbTPbaT3QFIDdzNLDwmRzQrV4l_t6i0&e=

>>

>>This is a recurring complaint about PDSEs, but I don't see the merit

>>in it. MVS has provided a mechanism to include program objects when

>>it is IPLed.

>>

>>--

>>Tom Marchant

>>

>>----------------------------------------------------------------------

>>For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,

>>send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

>

>----------------------------------------------------------------------

>For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,

>send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN



----------------------------------------------------------------------

For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,

send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


________________________________

This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the 
intended recipient(s) and may contain information that is confidential and 
protected by law from unauthorized disclosure. Any unauthorized review, use, 
disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended 
recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of 
the original message.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to