>Sometimes I see SMF 30 for Master Scheduler AS showing very large amounts of >memory. >>SMF 30 is extremely unreliable for memory anyway, so I'm not sure >what to make of that.
You confuse me, Martin. I was not asking about the Master Scheduler (*MASTER*) nor about memory usage. What did you meant to tell me? -- Peter Hunkeler ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
