Answering anyway, even if *I'm* neither you or me :-): FRR is generally only appropriate when you have no other choice. But I've recently implemented an ARR, which is purportedly a higher-performing alternative to ESTAE[X]. The IEAARR macro invokes the protected routine, so it replaces your CALL/LINK/whatever. It fit in nicely for my situation.
The IEAARR macro itself is ridiculous. Just grimace and bear it. sas On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 11:12 AM, Charles Mills <[email protected]> wrote: > @Peter, thanks as always. > >.... I wonder if perhaps FRR would be > appropriate. (Not a question for you; a question for me.) > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
