>>Since LSQA is System Private Storage how come there isn't a TCB associated >>with it
>Who said there isn't? VSM said so. LSQA, as shown in the subpool table in the books, has a variant that is associated with the current task, one that is associated with the jobstep task, and one that is not associated with any task (for example, see subpools 253, 254, 255). A key reason for the last is so that someone can use LSQA for an SRB that is not associated with a TCB, for which you might not want private storage obtained by the SRB to be freed just because some task terminates. I do not know whether the task association for subpools 253 and 254 is surfaced by VSMLIST. Peter Relson z/OS Core Technology Design ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
