> On Jun 29, 2017, at 17:52, J R <[email protected]> wrote: > > It really was a long time ago, but I think only one TSO user was swapped in > at a time within each region. (There were TSEVENTs then, much like SYSEVENTs > now). > > Caveat: I'm pretty much down to my last brain cell, so I could be > misremembering. I spent 50 years in this business; the knowledge is still > in my head but the table of contents and the index are both shot. YMMV!
So, to answer your question, DDnames, TIOTs, etc., LSQA, would be swapped out, therefore no collisions. However, ENQs would remain in force globally. >> On Jun 29, 2017, at 16:09, Paul Gilmartin >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> What, then, was the scope of an allocation? Of an ENQ? What happened if >> multiple users concurrently ALLOCATEd SYSUT2? I suppose carefully avoiding >> RET=HAVE could keep the DSN spaces separate. And users would just need to >> deal with that and the "IKJ56246I type_name NOT ALLOCATED, FILE IN USE" >> condition. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
