STGPROT in the CICS SIT, telling CICS that various Dynamic Storage Areas should be allocated in CICS or user key storage. Also dependent parameters TRANISO, RENTPGM, TCTUAKEY, CWAKEY.
I think storage protection came in around CICS/ESA 3.3 (early 90's). Ant. -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Edward Gould Sent: Friday, 9 June 2017 1:35 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: LE QuestionT - now CICS > On Jun 8, 2017, at 7:49 AM, Peter Relson <rel...@us.ibm.com> wrote: > ————————————SNIP——————————————————————————— Peter, good answer. This reminds me a little of something long long ago. Maybe someone here can refresh (correct?) my memory. From the time CICS came out the sysprogs were always seemingly fighting storage overlays (if memory serves me). After 5-8 years?? CICS’s answer was to use different storage keys to isolate and prevent storage overlays. Can someone correct my memory of this, please? Ed > Tony H's response was right on target. Using different user-region > subpools does nothing to help prevent overwrites or corruption. > It does help a bit with someone unintentionally freeing the wrong thing. > Some applications might choose unique subpools to accommodate a > subpool freemain. > > Peter Relson > z/OS Core Technology Design > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send > email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
