I don't really know anything about this but it sounds to me like one of @Gil's 
cases of making a good modification in the wrong place. Why not do this is such 
a way as to be transparent to old QSAM programs -- no need for a DCBE? Have an 
operand in the JCL or in SYS1.PARMLIB or the PPT to make it behave as described 
below if necessary, but by default honor the JCL blocksize and hide the > 32K 
from the application. Tell the application the blocksize is 32K -- 15 bit 
integers being what they are -- but go ahead under the covers with a 260K 
blocksize. No QSAM program should be doing its own deblocking, and if it is, 
well, put an exception in the JCL or the PPT or wherever.

Or at the very least make the below behavior the default but have an option to 
honor the 260K even in the absence of a DCBE. Tell the customers their gun, 
their bullet, their feet.

Charles


-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf 
Of Jesse 1 Robinson
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2017 8:44 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: 31 vs 24 QSAM

I mentioned having modified a QSAM program to write 'large blocks' by replacing 
DCB with DCBE. My goal was to test the effect of very large blocks in our new 
tape subsystem, which we had learned was highly biased in favor of large 
blocks. This had nothing to do with AMODE, which was all 31. The program 
certainly ran faster with large blocks such as 260K. I could not distinguish 
improvement at the IOS level (lower I/O count) vs. improvement at the tape 
level. Most likely a combination. 

My problem with the new tape was that the vendor seemed to assume that a 
customer could just tweak JCL to create giant blocks. In fact many of our 
largest tape files are created by utilities--IBM or otherwise--that are not 
written for large blocks. In practice you can code as large a block size as you 
wish, but if the program contains only DCBs, any size greater than 32K is 
simply ignored without error. While the change to DCBE was very simple, it has 
to be accomplished by the program owner.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to