>For APAR PI65115, it looks like a separate APAR PI68274, was opened for Cobol >6.1 >If you look at the information page for PI65115: >http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg1PI65115
Out of interest I had a look at what this is all about, and I must admit I'm baffled. What does that solution help? More, I'm baffled the new behaviour was accepted as an APARable problem. Writing beyond the end of a table overwrites something, be that the index-name or some other data. And it may lead to abnormal ends (the more lucky case), or worst, wrong data to be processed without even recognizing this fact. It is one of the most problematic coding error, IMHO. So, the PTF will not fix anything in my opinion. It will revert to the previous way of how tables are handled by the compiler, yes, but that's it. -- Peter Hunkeler ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
