It would not fail under MVS. My guess is that you are not checking the correct thing.
Post the minidump. On Mon, 12 Dec 2016 13:49:09 -0800 Charles Mills <[email protected]> wrote: :>I had guessed that an APF-authorized but otherwise "ordinary" program :>running with Key 8 would be able to issue an SPKA with an "address" of :>xxxxxx8x in problem state without getting a S0C2. I appear to have guessed :>wrong. I just wanted to do a reality check to make sure I had not :>fat-fingered something: typically a program in Key 8 does *not* have a :>PSW-key-mask bit of one for SPK 8 in Control Register 3? Is that correct? :>Just out of curiosity -- why would that be? Why not let a program set its :>SPK back to its original state? -- Binyamin Dissen <[email protected]> http://www.dissensoftware.com Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me, you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com domain. I very rarely bother responding to challenge/response systems, especially those from irresponsible companies. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
