Things may have changed since I was an undergrad, but around that time there some court ruling in California to the effect that merely posting 'No Trespassing' signs had no legal weight unless 'trespassers' were periodically locked out. So one day a year the entire campus was closed to outside traffic just to prove that the postings were enforced--and therefore enforceable. It was a great inconvenience to everyone, and the practice may have since been discontinued. The consequences of being unable to prosecute trespassers were deemed too grave not take preemptory action.
. . J.O.Skip Robinson Southern California Edison Company Electric Dragon Team Paddler SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager 323-715-0595 Mobile 626-302-7535 Office [email protected] -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of R.S. Sent: Sunday, September 18, 2016 1:18 PM To: [email protected] Subject: (External):Re: Down with idiotic disclaimer footers and dumb surveys! The value of such disclaimer is much less than "private area" sign on the ground. The last really oblige trespasser. However IMHO none of us is able to get rid of the disclaimer. Of course, the choice is not to use corporate e-mail, but ...nowadays many organizations prohibit access to external mail services. Catch 22. Or just get accustomed to ignore the bullsh*t. -- Radoslaw Skorupka Lodz, Poland ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
