Note: Cross posting to IBM-Main Upgrading from CICS3.2 to 5.2 and trying to figure out what my illustrious predecessor did. We have a working 3.2 system, but something seems odd about the SVC set-up Simple CICS 3.2 here, no plex, only one region, period.
SYSIN has: CICSSVC=230, SIT has: CICSSVC=230, The CICS SVC number HPO=YES, VTAM High Performance Option (HPO) SRBSVC=215, HPO Type 6 SVC number OLD JCL exists for LINK of DFHHPSVC into the nucleus as type 6, TASID shows: SVC___ Address Name____ Amode Type APF ESR NP Assist __Locks__ 215 D7 81AC5160 DFHHPSVC 31 6 | | | | | | 215 D7 81834A4C 31 2 | |C| | | | 230 E6 8336E310 *Unknown 31 3/4 | | | | | | 230 E6 81834A4C 31 2 | |C| | | | It looks like CICS is just ignoring the CICSSVC entries which do not seem to point to a real SVC, and going with the SVC 215. IFF that is do so, should I just leave out the CICSSVC values for clarity? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
