On 08/19/2016 02:55 PM, Andy Higgins wrote:
If I had to guess (and I do) I'd say the complaint (RC8 RSN3A?) is due to the
trailing blanks in the pattern. The example in the book has a pattern with no
trailing blanks.
hth
Andy
On Fri, 19 Aug 2016 13:54:15 -0400, Steve Thompson <[email protected]> wrote:
I am having a problem with IEATDUMP. I am trying to use &DS. I've
read the manuals. I've searched the manuals.
If I understand correctly, &DS resolves to nnn such as 001, 002, etc.
So why is the system complaining about this construct (at
execution time, not during assembly):
DC AL1(44),CL44'CMPL.&&JOBNAME..D&&YYMMDD..T&&HHMMSS..D&&DS'
<SNIPPAGE>
I will have to give that a try. But now I have to find another
model to use because when I took the &DS out, I got a security
failure in trying to allocate the data set.
Got bit by the change in a rule for the HLQ and what the second
level has to be.
BTW -- All I did was remove the &DS, I did not change the length
byte contents at all.
Regards,
Steve Thompson.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
