On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 10:10 AM, Lizette Koehler <[email protected]> wrote:
> My preference is to always code a HASPPARM dd statement. That way you do > not get a misleading > IEC130I HASPPARM DD STATEMENT MISSING > > ​m​ > essage which could distract from the true issue. Also provides better > documentation in JES2 where the member is coming from. Defaults are fine, > unless you do not know the rules. Sysprogs of the future may not > understand how JES2 gets its init deck. > I was going to comment on the truth of this. But I got so sarcastic that even I got offended. > Lizette > > > -- Klein bottle for rent -- inquire within. Maranatha! <>< John McKown ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
