On Sun, 15 May 2016 15:55:37 -0400 michelbutz <[email protected]> wrote:
:>Forget about my design how about :>A general XMEM question what the point if :>You are going to get S0C4 Why would I ignore a bad design? If you are asking for advice, be humble enough to accept that others already went down the path and are aware of the dangers. Explain why you need access to the other address space. What is your business case? :>> On May 15, 2016, at 2:30 PM, Binyamin Dissen <[email protected]> wrote: :>> On Sun, 15 May 2016 14:12:39 -0400 michealbutz <[email protected]> :>> wrote: :>> :>Transferring data between 2 address spaces weather its MVCP/MVCS or AR mode :>> :>there is always the possibility of a S0C4. :>> :>What the best way of making sure the target Address Space is Swapped in. :>> :>Doing XMEM post to the target address space to do a SYSEVENT ? :>> Terrible design. You should rethink it. -- Binyamin Dissen <[email protected]> http://www.dissensoftware.com Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me, you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com domain. I very rarely bother responding to challenge/response systems, especially those from irresponsible companies. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
