I’m not sure what the problem is with removing active CPs. At the start of a 
CBU window, extra CPs are made available in the hardware. If a system is newly 
IPLed at that point, it will see all available CPs defined in the Image 
profile. If a system is already running when CBU is activated, additional CPs 
must be configured online by MVS command. 

At the end of a CBU window, an LPAR may be deactivated if desired, or the extra 
CPs may simply be configured offline by MVS command, at which point the OS will 
no longer 'see' the removal of CBU CPs. This is fully dynamic.

There is (only?) one clue in the OS that CBU has been started or stopped. WLM 
issues a message about a capacity change upon either adding or removing CP(s). 
That message should be highlighted in everyone's automation and broadcast in 
some way because it can also occur in the case of a hardware problem. We once 
had an internal cooling problem that caused CPU degradation in the box. We got 
the same WLM message. 

Likewise storage may be configured on or offline dynamically if and only if it 
has been defined at IPL as RECONFIGURABLE.

.
.
.
J.O.Skip Robinson
Southern California Edison Company
Electric Dragon Team Paddler 
SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager
323-715-0595 Mobile
626-302-7535 Office
[email protected]

-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf 
Of Jon Butler
Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2016 7:34 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: (External):Re: Dynamic CPU ADD to a z/OS lpar

You can add CPs or memory to an active LPAR, but you can't take either away 
without stopping the LPAR.   You don't want more CPs assigned than you (or 
PR/SM) can use...it's just overhead.  In fact, unused CPs will be "parked" on 
newer CECs when underutilized


----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to