During the 80s and 90s, a lot of shops restructured to cull the innovators 
(writers/installers) from the maintainers. A thinly disguised shakeout of the 
men vs. the boys. A friend of mine (female) scoffed at this artificial 
hierarchy by arguing than any dolt could follow a step-by-step recipe to 
install and customize a software product, but it took maturity and insight and 
a highly reliable gut to manage the care and feeding of said product through 
its life span. Maintenance is an unglamorous art, but try driving your shiny 
new Tesla over a crumbling road. 

I like this article. 

.
.
.
J.O.Skip Robinson
Southern California Edison Company
Electric Dragon Team Paddler 
SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager
323-715-0595 Mobile
626-302-7535 Office
[email protected]


-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf 
Of Edward Finnell
Sent: Saturday, April 09, 2016 1:25 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: (External):Re: Interesting article on why sustained maintenance is 
better than the lates...

Well duh? Pretty standard for software development. Worked with Col. Putnam  in 
the service. True egghead, but very insightful as to how much software cost  to 
develop, deploy and maintain. Was kinda funny he'd start out throwing up  these 
slide and the Generals would go to sleep, few more and the NCO's would  drift 
off, towards the end he's explain how it fitted into eigenvalue models and  the 
civilians would check out. When it got to Questions only a few of us  left and 
you better be prepared for an answer complete with 
sidebars and where  did you miss this in the presentation?     
 
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Putnam_model
 
 
In a message dated 4/9/2016 7:46:53 A.M. Central Daylight Time, 
[email protected] writes:

The  article argues that sustained maintenance is necessary to a successful  
solution. Sound familiar?

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to