> o Isn't the argument to EX a DDNAME, not a DSNAME? No!
> o What causes that PDS to be allocated? The EX command. ________________________________________ From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> on behalf of Paul Gilmartin <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, March 19, 2016 10:25 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: SYSPROC Concatenation? On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 23:28:46 -0500, Ed Gould wrote: >The way I learned to do it was that logon procs did a universal ex >sysproc(logon) and if you had a pds that had the member logon in it o Isn't the argument to EX a DDNAME, not a DSNAME? o What causes that PDS to be allocated? That was the OP's question. Or is the assumption that there's an optional 'prefix.SYSPROC(LOGON)' and that failure of the EXEC command is tolerable. >it would exec that clist and in that clist you could allocate the >libraries to your liking. With the understanding that if didn't have >IBM libraries first don't come trouble shooting to us. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
