OK, not being negative, but this is just the BC version of a z13, right? With some minor other stuff? Not unimpressive, but not quite the revolution that the announcement tries to make it sound like.
Or am I missing something? On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 6:50 PM, Mark Post <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> On 2/18/2016 at 06:20 PM, Frank Swarbrick <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Just a comment, the name z13s did not appear to me to be a name of a new > > system, but rather just the plural of z13, i.e. "Look at those z13s > run!". > > Took me a while to figure out this was in fact a new name and a new > offering. > > > > Perhaps I'm the only one... > > I don't think any marketeer has ever been accused of being "too smart." > > > Mark Post > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > -- zMan -- "I've got a mainframe and I'm not afraid to use it" ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
