Your security product, whatever it is, may have a requirement for a library to
be in the LPA concatenation, I believe.
Bill J.
On Tuesday, February 16, 2016 8:19 AM, John McKown
<[email protected]> wrote:
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 6:51 AM, Nathan Astle <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Apology for asking dummy question.
>
> Is there a reason on why we need to place Security product LPALIB after the
> System LPALIB in LPALST00 ?
>
​Because the vendor said to? [grin].
I would guess that it would be for the same reason as with a STEPLIB. If a
duplicate named module exists​, the one in the data set "higher" in the
list is the one actually used. Perhaps your security vendor has
deliberately done some "nasty" things to replace modules which are in other
LPA libraries and want to be sure that _their_ module is loaded. I'd scan
the names to see if there are any duplicates of those in libraries "below"
the security product library. And perhaps ask the vendor why they are doing
that. No, I don't have an example.
> Nathan
>
>
--
The man has the intellect of a lobotomized turtle.
Maranatha! <><
John McKown
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
