On 28 January 2016 at 16:14, Charles Mills <[email protected]> wrote: > Hmmm. Interesting. The doc does seem to imply just exactly that. See return > code 0C. I am surprised. Seems to me I have done exactly what I described, > but perhaps I mis-remember.
Very strange. I too thought I remembered doing an IDENTIFY of code I had built in storage I GETMAINed. But maybe that *was* privileged, as Gil says. Tony H. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
