On 2015-12-07 09:58, J O Skip Robinson wrote: > Gil's point raises an issue more critical than just the question at hand. > Once upon a time, 'reading JES2 parms' would have been a reasonable strategy > in general for determining how JES2 runs. Since the advent of pervasive > dynamic changes, however, the init deck as coded is no longer a reliable > window into JES2 processing. A great many changes are now made simply by > command. Old values are ignored on hot start and in many cases even on > all-system warm start. Only a cold start will reinstate coded parm values > that might actually be years out of date. > > There is today no substitute for a display command with full detail. > More modern systems, often on desktops, have similar dynamic change facilities. However they often have a "Save as Default" checkbox which does the equivalent of writing the changes back to the init deck and making them persistent.
-- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
