On Tue, 17 Nov 2015 18:20:34 -0600, Paul Gilmartin wrote: >On Tue, 17 Nov 2015 17:57:46 -0600, Paul Gilmartin wrote: > >>On Tue, 17 Nov 2015 03:06:10 -0700, Lizette Koehler wrote: >>> >>>Is there another process that could be used to identify the OLDEST GDG for >>>Input >>>and then delete that GDG? Or is there another way to handle this situation? >>> I >>>was going to see if the LISTC could be faster than CSI. >>> >Naively, I'd expect that LISTCAT use CSI, or something very similar.
Been a while, but the samples I looked at were just that - and did need some cleaning up. Mark Z will have a bunch of good examples for sure. LISTCAT using generics was awful - I seem to remember some fixes for that a while back - but CSI when properly constructed was awesome. Done in assembler more so, as expected. It looks like it finds *everything* - including the connector records for cats that have been disconnected. I found myself running through mastercats I shouldn't have been even able to see. Like I said, if you are careful, CSI is awesome. Shane ... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
