On 2015-11-17, at 08:16, R.S. wrote:
> W dniu 2015-11-17 o 16:01, Charles Mills pisze:
>> Could be the software, or at least a vulnerability in the software. Windows
>> 3.1 has not had a security patch since who knows when.
> The good news it does not need most of the patches.
> In the old times I was the only user of Win3.1 while other migrated to Win95
> or Win98 (and some WinNT4). My computer was the only one not-vulnerable for
> any attack my network guys could imagine and test. They were able to kill any
> machine on the network except mine.
> Last, but not least: isolated environment provide physical security.
>
Related:
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/18/technology/microsoft-once-infested-with-security-flaws-does-an-about-face.html
-- gil
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
