On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 10:19:34 -0500 "Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)" <[email protected]> wrote:
:>In <[email protected]>, on 10/15/2015 :> at 03:59 PM, Binyamin Dissen <[email protected]> said: :>>The OP was referring to a service that documents a :>>requirement of AMODE31 and that returns via BR. :>>If your API requires BASSM linkage :>Is there a special on red herrings? You seem to be offering a lot of :>them. Not at all. :>Yes, from a program running in an unexpwected AMODE. Use of BASSM :>would have made that a nonisuue. :>>The suggesting of using BASSM :>>to switch amodes in this case is ludicrous. :>Only to one who doesn't understand the issue, which is *saving*, :>setting and *restoring* the AMODE. The OPs issue was that he was running amode64 and wished to invoke a service that required amode31. Use of BASSM would simply complicate things and not gain anything. SAM31 before the call and SAM64 after the call works perfectly. I grant you the last word. -- Binyamin Dissen <[email protected]> http://www.dissensoftware.com Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me, you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com domain. I very rarely bother responding to challenge/response systems, especially those from irresponsible companies. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
