Charles, I would think we need some leverage like you mentioned in Share. I haven't be fortunate enough to go. It was obvious that the CIO they spoke of had an axe to grind and didn't know what she was speaking about.
Regards, Scott On Saturday, September 26, 2015, Charles Mills <[email protected]> wrote: > A lot now -- in peoples' minds -- after they read articles like that. > > Who would like to help save the systems that we love and the jobs that we > need by helping to set these writers straight? > > Charles > > -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected] > <javascript:;>] On Behalf Of Scott Ford > Sent: Saturday, September 26, 2015 3:23 PM > To: [email protected] <javascript:;> > Subject: Re: Setting the writers right > > Charles, > > I read the article, I said "what does COBOL have to do with Security"? > > Scott > > On Saturday, September 26, 2015, Charles Mills <[email protected] > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > "... the OPM is facing a huge problem with modernizing its security > > measures and tactics because of one acronym: COBOL. The programming > > language that rose to prominence in the 1960s is rampant throughout > > the OPM and with the advanced persistent threats federal agencies are > > experiencing, it's a significant vulnerability." > > > > -- http://fedtechmagazine.com/OPMhack > > > > Charles > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected] > <javascript:;> > > <javascript:;>] On Behalf Of Charles Mills > > Sent: Friday, September 25, 2015 10:11 AM > > To: [email protected] <javascript:;> <javascript:;> > > Subject: Setting the writers right > > > > A recurring theme here the past couple of weeks has been the "head in > > the 1960's" writing about mainframes in news stories and now soap operas. > > > > Seriously, would it make sense for our community to put together a > > volunteer team (under the auspices of SHARE? Or ... ?) that would > > maintain a watch for stupid mainframe media putdowns and send off a > > packet of layperson-accessible education to the offending writers, > > editors and/or producers? Perhaps have a Website where writers could > > get current facts about the mainframe? Would IBM participate in some > > way? > > > > Any ideas? I volunteer to participate but not to lead. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] <javascript:;> with the message: > INFO IBM-MAIN > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
