Barbara Nitz wrote: >... because he *knew* I would find something to get us closer to a solution.
This is a good compliment. Not everyone have these nice bosses. > ... getting the operators to find the docs and act upon it took at least > twice as long as the actual sadump did. They could at least read and act! Wowowow, that is better than our ops... ;-P >I believe using IPCS and reading dumps is a dying art practised only by a few >magicians these days. A shame, really. ><coming off of my soap box now> Thanks for getting off the soap box, now my turn. A few weeks ago I had to wear a magician's hat (no rabbits! the SPCA wont like it), staff and jacket and try to debug a weird COBOL error, but that was actually not an error, just a warning that IGZETUN is not supported anymore. After some dump reading, diagnostics, putting in DISPLAY, etc. I just re-compiled the program (discarding VS COBOL in LKED step in favour of CEE.SCEELKED) and its stubs. All things went jolly without any problems thereafter. I agree it is a shame that dump reading is a dying art, really! <getting of the soap box, next one please> Groete / Greetings Elardus Engelbrecht Where does Father Christmas go when he is ill? To Ho-Ho-Ho-Hospital. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
