In <[email protected]>, on 08/27/2015
at 05:38 PM, "R.S." <[email protected]> said:
>What I understod from the lecture:
>a) mainframes are old, obsolete, but unfotunately sometimes still in
>use - which is a sin.
If they do the job as well as or better than available alternatives
then they're not obsolete.
>b) mainframes are insecure
Compared to what?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
