Ah, we don't use IGGCATxx. There is also the ancient SYSCATLG member of 
SYS1.NUCLEUS. I'm sure that LOADxx overrides SYSCATLG, but what about IGGCATxx? 
If these members specify different values for ALIASLEVEL, who wins the thumb 
wrestle?

.
.
.
J.O.Skip Robinson
Southern California Edison Company
Electric Dragon Team Paddler 
SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager
626-302-7535 Office
323-715-0595 Mobile
[email protected]

-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf 
Of John Eells
Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2015 9:27 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Catalog entry not visible

[email protected] (J O Skip Robinson) wrote:
> Now that your system is up, be sure to 'harden' the dynamic change. These 
> days alias level is specified in LOADxx in your IPL PARM data set. It 
> defaults to 1 and may not be currently specified at all, which would explain 
> your string of woes.
<snip>

One may also choose to specify this in IGGCATxx these days using ALIASLEVEL(n), 
where n is a number from 1-4.  No matter where (un)specified, the default is 
the same.

--
John Eells
z/OS Technical Marketing
IBM Poughkeepsie
[email protected]


----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to