Lizette, That's a idea. I guess maybe CEEPIPI..I want to make sure I do this so I don't cause other issues for customers, that would not be good.
Regards, Scott On Thursday, August 27, 2015, Lizette Koehler <[email protected]> wrote: > This is not my forte, but I thought I would just throw this out. > > Could you STC be written with a higher level Assembler stub routine that > would be monitoring for things like CANCEL XXXX. That routine would then > signal a daughter task to provide the function you want? > > Lizette > > > > > -----Original Message----- > >From: Scott Ford <[email protected] <javascript:;>> > >Sent: Aug 27, 2015 7:58 AM > >To: [email protected] <javascript:;> > >Subject: Re: LE Condition Handler > > > >Elardus, > > > >I like that also..I like the RACF protection...especially on a STC for > >Provisioning and Reconciliation. > > > > > >Regards, > >Scott > > > >On Thursday, August 27, 2015, Sam Siegel <[email protected] <javascript:;>> > wrote: > > > >> On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 6:02 AM, Scott Ford <[email protected] > <javascript:;> > >> <javascript:;>> wrote: > >> > >> > All: > >> > > >> > I need a sanity check on a design I am wanting to do. We have a Cobol > STC > >> > running with a Assembler Operator Interface, single thread. > >> > I understand I could redo in Assembler and multi-task, redo in C or > C++ > >> and > >> > thread, but this isnt what I am looking for. Inside the STC we > maintain > >> > a secondary index of data items. If the Operator issues a 'P ......' > or > >> > 'C ........' we will loose the secondary index. My idea is to write a > >> > Cobol condition > >> > handler with TRAP(ON) in LE to capture the S222 and at that time read > the > >> > secondary index and write to disk. I am just not sure of the steps in > the > >> > Cobol. > >> > > >> > >> Scott - Sorry to have to deliver the bad news. LE condition handlers do > >> not intercept Sx22 abends, even with TRAP(ON). See the LE Programming > >> guide (SA22-7561) chapter 15: TRAP Effects on the Condition Handling > >> Process. > >> > >> Sam > >> > >> > >> > >> > I could write the condition handler in Assembler or C I dont care. My > >> > object is not to loose this data.. > >> > > >> > Any ideas,opinions are welcome and appreciated. > >> > > >> > Scott Ford > >> > www.idmworks.com > >> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] <javascript:;> with the message: > INFO IBM-MAIN > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
