I'm aware. Thanks. It's not a RACF question; I was just using RACF notation to express my logic.
Charles -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Lizette Koehler Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2015 2:40 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: How does one definitively recognize a temp dataset by name? If you were not aware, there is a RACF list that might be more helpful. To subscribe to the RACF-L discussion in order to receive postings, send a note to: [email protected] Include the following line in the body of the note, substituting your first name and last name as indicated: subscribe racf-l first_name last_name To post a question or response to the RACF-L forum, send a note to: [email protected] Please include an appropriate subject line in your posting. Lizette -----Original Message----- >From: Sri h Kolusu <[email protected]> >Sent: Jul 2, 2015 2:06 PM >To: [email protected] >Subject: Re: How does one definitively recognize a temp dataset by name? > >Charles, > >with 'SYS*.T*.R*.**' list you may pick SYS1.TOPSCRET.RACF.LIST files >which is not a temp dataset . So I would suggest adding YY and DDD also >to your search list 'SYSyyddd.T*.R*.**' > >Here is a link to naming convention of temp datasets > >http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/iea2b6b1/12.22.2.6? > >All temporary data set names begin as follows: > > SYSyyddd.Thhmmss.RA000.jjobname > > >where: >yy >indicates the year >ddd >indicates the Julian day >hh >indicates the hour >mm >indicates the minute >ss >indicates the second >jjobname >indicates the name of the job > > >Thanks >Kolusu > > > >From: Charles Mills <[email protected]> >To: [email protected] >Date: 07/02/2015 01:56 PM >Subject: How does one definitively recognize a temp dataset by >name? >Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> > > > >Is there a definitive rule for recognizing *by name* a system temporary >dataset? The actual name, not &&WHATEVER. I am checking for (using RACF >EGN notation here to express my rule) 'SYS*.T*.R*.**'. Is that >sufficient to preclude false positives? Will it produce false >negatives? Is it over-specified? > >Thanks, > >Charles > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
