On Thu, 2 Jul 2015 13:14:05 -0500 Mike Schwab <[email protected]> wrote:
:>http://www-01.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSLTBW_2.1.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r1.ieam900/bv1184w.htm Yes, I recognize that is the "normal" behavior. I do not want it. :>>When the secondary extent is specified as zero for a PDS to PDSE copy, the secondary extent is set to one unit of the space unit that is specified as the primary allocation, to allow the copy to proceed. A PDSE is likely to run slightly larger than a PDS, and the user might not have allocated the PDSE any larger. At the end of processing, the secondary extent is set back to zero. :>On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 12:58 PM, Binyamin Dissen :><[email protected]> wrote: :>> But I do not want it to be set/increased. :>> How can I force it so that secondary extents are not allocated? -- Binyamin Dissen <[email protected]> http://www.dissensoftware.com Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me, you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com domain. I very rarely bother responding to challenge/response systems, especially those from irresponsible companies. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
