On Mon, 15 Jun 2015 08:29:12 -0700, Charles Mills wrote: >But there are no dates or years in the question, only duration. And the >durations are by implication well under a year. > I'll grant that I hijacked the topic by introducing the legal consequences of calendar dates. But "well under a year" is irrelevant. Adding a mere 60 seconds to 2008-12-31 23:59:00 should give a date in 2008, not in 2009. The interval from 2008-12-31 23:59:59 to 2009-01-01 00:00:01 is three seconds. But if the program has kept formatted time stamps from TIME macro, will the difference between CONVTOD of those two values yield the correct result in 64-bit TOD format? IBM shirks providing the necessary documentation. This should not be left to programmers' intuition.
-- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
