Lizette, You are absolutely correct.
Rex -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Lizette Koehler Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2015 7:53 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Mysterious U4088-63 from RPTSTG(ON) SDSF I believe is ISF Lizette > -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] > On Behalf Of Ed Gould > Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2015 4:39 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Mysterious U4088-63 from RPTSTG(ON) > > Charles (and others) > > Has LE obsconded with SDSF's *RESERVED* use of ISA prefix? > > Ed > > On May 28, 2015, at 4:58 PM, Charles Mills wrote: > > > Well that would make sense ... > > > > In my case the program does not ABEND if some function -- also > > relative branch -- is called first rather than ISAUTH, which makes no > > sense at all. > > > > I have not tried every possibility, for example > > > > - what if I called some other function rather than ISAUTH at the early > > point in the C++ logic where I call (or comment out the call > > to) ISAUTH? > > - what if I called ISAUTH later in the program, after other functions > > had been called successfully? > > > > Seems to me if I were writing a "how much heap actually got used" > > tool I would just initialize the whole heap to X'DEADBEEF' or > > X'8BADF00D' or something and then at EOJ search from the top for the > > end of the initial value. But what do I know. > > > > Charles > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM- > [email protected]] > > On Behalf Of Andy Wood > > Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2015 2:33 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: Mysterious U4088-63 from RPTSTG(ON) > > > > On Thu, 28 May 2015 07:56:03 -0700, Charles Mills <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > . . . > >> > >> I would assume C++ gets the stack at startup, not on the first > >> external call. Interesting thought. > > > > I have this very vague recollection, that when RPTSTG is ON, things > > are set up so that the stack is always too small (or gives that > > appearance), so that routine gets called every time. > > > > However, it has been a very long time since I was near anything like > > that, things may have changed, and perhaps I had the story wrong in > > the first place. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN The information contained in this message is confidential, protected from disclosure and may be legally privileged. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, distribution, copying, or any action taken or action omitted in reliance on it, is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this message and destroy the material in its entirety, whether in electronic or hard copy format. Thank you. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
