Are they concatenation with non-apf Libs in the step lib? On Friday, February 27, 2015, Ken MacKenzie <ken.macken...@pramerica.ie> wrote:
> Hi all, > > We're in the process of upgrading to Enterprise COBOL 5.1 and one of our > development groups has decided to re-compile all their COBOL modules even > though it is not deemed necessary - that's their prerogative. > > One of their programs is exhibiting strange behaviour on the development > LPAR that I have been unable to replicate on our sandbox system. > > If they code the LE libraries SCEERUN and SCEERUN2 in their JOBLIB > statement, their program runs OK. However, if they allow the LE libraries > to come from link list (as they should) their program abends with S0C4 - > the address of the offending instruction is way outside of the module > reported in the dump - probably a wild branch, I guess. > > Has anyone encountered anything similar? Why should coding LE libraries > in your JOBLIB (the same with STEPLIB, incidentally) cause a module to > work when it doesn't work from link list? > > Any helpful suggestions welcomed. > > > Ken MacKenzie > Pramerica Systems Ireland Limited > is a private company limited by shares > incorporated and registered in the Republic of Ireland with registered > number 319900 > and registered office at 6th Floor, South Bank House, Barrow Street, > Dublin 4, Ireland. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu <javascript:;> with the message: > INFO IBM-MAIN > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
